Participation, Group Decision Making, Virtual Teams
Comments: 2 - Date: January 8th, 2009 - Categories: Teams, Workplace
Another interesting paper at HICSS:
“Cultural Diversity, Perception of Work Atmosphere, and Task Conflict in Collaboration Technology
Supported Global Virtual Teams: Findings from a Laboratory Experiment”
by Souren Paul and Sumati Ray
The main findings:
- perceived work atmosphere is positively related to participation in work groups
- participation increases task conflict which is required for high quality decisions (see pre-existing literature on the value of conflict in teams!)
- the findings highlight the importance of developing favorable perception of work atmosphere inculturally diverse virtual teams.
Conclusion: perceived work atmosphere is critical in shaping the performance of virtual teams
Here is the paper’s official abstract:
In this paper, we focus on work atmosphere and
conflict in global virtual teams and report the
findings of a laboratory experiment that involved
twenty-seven cross-cultural virtual teams. The
members of the teams used IBM’s Lotus Sametime to
work on decision-making tasks. The findings of the
study reveal that in collaboration technology
supported virtual teams, the cultural heterogeneity of
the team members influences their perceptions of the
work atmosphere, which in its turn influences
members’ participation in group work. We also find
that the number of occurrences of task conflict
related discussion among the group members is
positively related to their participation in group
work. The findings of the study are interesting and
provide motivation for future research on work
atmosphere and conflict in virtual teams.
Comment by Macker - 8 January 2009 @ 9:06 pm
What kind of conflict in teams, specifically?
Comment by Joan DiMicco - 12 January 2009 @ 4:27 pm
Hi Michael,
The paper is focusing on task-related conflict, not interpersonal conflict. Here’s an excerpt from the paper:
“The relationship conflict, which is based on
emotional or interpersonal issues is detrimental to the
functioning of a team. But task conflict is actually
beneficial to the team effectiveness (Van de Vilert
and De Dreu, 1994). Task conflict is the
disagreement on task content or process. A moderate
level of task conflict is positively associated with
team performance because it causes team members to
consider more alternatives. Considering diverse
opinions and strategies enable a group to arrive at a
better solution (Pelled et al., 1999). Jehn (1997)
found that type of task group members perform
shapes whether conflict helps, hinders, or has no
significant impact on individual and group
performance. Rahim (2002) mentioned that one of
the problems of conflict management is that the two
dimensions of conflict are positively correlated.”
I’ll send you the paper by email….