<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a social network a product or a feature?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joandimicco.com/blog/2007/10/25/is-a-social-network-a-product-or-a-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joandimicco.com/blog/2007/10/25/is-a-social-network-a-product-or-a-feature/</link>
	<description>A blog by Joan Morris DiMicco discussing social software and group collaboration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:11:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.joandimicco.com/blog/2007/10/25/is-a-social-network-a-product-or-a-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-9958</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joandimicco.com/blog/2007/10/25/is-a-social-network-a-product-or-a-feature/#comment-9958</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read the article yet, but a $15B valuation is about 100x revenue, which is about $150M, estimates say.  Another estimate I saw said they probably spend $50M a year.  So that gives them a theoretical P/E of 150.  Pretty absurd, no?

The problem is, though their subscriber base can continue to grow slowly, it can also plummet rapidly, if something &quot;hotter&quot; comes along.  And if the user base plummets, then the valuation does, too.  Maybe some service will come along and do mobility better, or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read the article yet, but a $15B valuation is about 100x revenue, which is about $150M, estimates say.  Another estimate I saw said they probably spend $50M a year.  So that gives them a theoretical P/E of 150.  Pretty absurd, no?</p>
<p>The problem is, though their subscriber base can continue to grow slowly, it can also plummet rapidly, if something &#8220;hotter&#8221; comes along.  And if the user base plummets, then the valuation does, too.  Maybe some service will come along and do mobility better, or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
