Is your blog feminine or masculine?

Gender Genie is a genius because it figured out that my blog is written by a female and Josh Simon’s blog is written by a male. Ok, a sample size of 2 probably isn’t sufficient, which is why I’m blogging about it, hoping others will try it out and report back.

I’m fascinated because it just does a simple keyword analysis. I hate over simplifications and gender stereotypes, but apparently women use “with” and men use “around” in their posts.

UPDATE: I can stop the stereotyping! My female friend Andrea’s blog has been rated as male.



T-shirts that fit

This is a very funny post on “Creating Passionate Users” that hits on one of my pet peeves about tech companies and tech conference and the XXL t-shirts they give out. In this age of trying to recruit and support a diverse workforce AND in this age of product specialization and customization, it seems rather backward to hand out t-shirts that only fit the XXL attendees. If you give out a fitted woman’s shirt, the women will not only take note that you consider them valid members of the community, they will also WEAR the darn shirt!

The point is showing us that you care about more than just saving a few bucks on a t-shirt print run. That you care about ALL your users, not just the Big Burly Men. And even if you do not care, you’d think the marketers would get a clue that people aren’t going to be wearing your logo around giving you free advertising if the shirt doesn’t fit. The bar’s been set pretty low on this, so even a MEN’S SMALL would make me happy.

I agree!



Reader Questions…… Now Actually Answered


The cool thing about tracking your own website’s hits is that you can tell what people were looking for when they came to your site. But sometimes you are in the situation where you know the answer to their question, but the answer is not on your website. So I’m going to give a little bit more to the blogosphere tonight and answer some of the questions that random internet readers had, but couldn’t answer by reading my blog:

“mac does not detect blackberry”

In my experience, my Mac did not detect my blackberry until I had the proper version of Pocketmac (the one for the 8100) installed on the machine. And then I had to use the USB cable, not Bluetooth.

“blackberry pearl copy addresses from sim”

*UPDATE* You can copy your phone numbers from your SIM by going through the Blackberry set-up wizard. It will prompt you to copy your phone number over. That’s the only way I know of to do it.

When my phone was broken, the T-mobile customer support person explained to me is that the SIM card doesn’t support the Blackberry format for address book entries (because the SIM card only stores name and number), so there isn’t too much point to copying things back and forth. It is much better to use your computer’s address book as your backup. So hopefully you have a copy on a computer you can sync with.

“blackberry 8100 html tables”

In case my post wasn’t clear about this: don’t check the browser option to load HTML tables. It will make page loading much slower.

“recalibrating ipod nike”

To recalibrate the nike+ipod widget you just have to follow the menu options for recalibrating and run a set distance on a measured track (found at most high schools and universities). You can recalibrate for running or walking. I just did it for running and it vastly improved the accuracy. I think if I had also done it for walking, it would further improve accuracy.



CSCW Paper: The Chasms of CSCW: A Citation Graph Analysis of CSCW Conferences

This paper was presented at CSCW in Banff, Canada, Nov 4-8, 2006.
Authors:

  • Michal Jacovi
  • Natalia Marmasse
  • Vladimir Soroka
  • Sigalit Ur
  • Elad Shahar
  • Gail Gilboa-Freedman
  • all from BM Research Lab in Haifa, Israel


This paper analyzed the citation histories between CSCW papers over the past 20 years, looking at which papers cited each other and which topics the conference has spanned. Interesting if you consider yourself at all involved in this community. And there are several visualizations of the citation history that are cool.

The majority of papers at CSCW fall into either the category of “computer science” or “social science.” Outside of those two groups, there are two smaller clusters of papers that can be described as on “shared media spaces” and “instant messenger and presence.” And there is not a lot of cross-citing between these four groups. As someone pointed out in a conversation afterwards, that doesn’t mean the CS-types and Social-Science-types don’t go to each others’ talks or read each others’ papers or appreciate each others’ work. It just means that when they write papers, they cite the work that is most similar to their own. So they may not be as inspired by the different perspectives in the community as we might hope an indisciplinary community might be. As seems to be the tendency in our research community, this made us a little sad.

There are 17 key papers in CSCW that are not cited by any other CSCW papers but are popular with outside communities, particularly CHI. These span different HCI topics and some of them could be described as guest-style papers. So maybe CSCW has had an impact even if we ignore our own genius?



CSCW Paper: Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution

This paper was presented at CSCW in Banff, Canada, Nov 4-8, 2006.

Authors:

  • Shilad Sen
  • Shyong K. (Tony) Lam
  • Al Mamunur Rashid
  • Dan Cosley
  • Dan Frankowski
  • Jeremy Osterhouse
  • F. Maxwell Harper
  • John Riedl
  • all from University of Minnesota

Tags can be characterized as “selfish work that benefits the community.” So they are a good thing and we should understand what gets people to contribute them.

Types of tags:

  • factual: e.g. del.icio.us
  • subjective: e.g. amazon.com (“good” “great”)
  • personal: personally meaningful, perhaps date related

Today, most of the tags are factual in MovieLens, a movie recommendation site and their research platform.

Experiment

Created 4 tagging communities to determine what sharing conditions influenced how tags were created. The four conditions:

  1. no shared tags
  2. randomly chose some tags to share
  3. shared the most popular tags to share
  4. inference algorithm that found similar movies and found most popular tags across all of these movies, shared those

These 4 conditions generated 4 different types of tagging practices:

  1. tags were split evenly between personal, subjective, and factual
  2. favored subjective tags with a fair share of factual too
  3. favored factual tags
  4. favored factual tags

2,3,4 had very few personal tags

Conclusions:

  • people only liked the subjective tags they agree with
  • people like factual tags a lot
  • personal tags of others are not useful at all, but personally, they are very useful

Their data is highly influenced by a few number of people contributing a high proportion of the tags, but Shilad didn’t think this skew influenced the results.



CSCW Note: A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing

This paper was presented at CSCW in Banff, Canada, Nov 4-8, 2006.

Authors:

  • Cliff Lampe (Michigan State University)
  • Nicole Ellison (Michigan State University)
  • Charles Steinfield (Michigan State University)

Overview of Facebook usage by MSU undergraduates:

  • 96% of MSU undergrads have Facebook pages.
  • They spend an average of 30 minute/day on FB.
  • Only 5% think that professors are looking at their page.
  • For the most part, they think it is only MSU students and high school friends looking at their page.

Why do they use Facebook?

  • They keep in touch with their high school friends (abandoned social networks)
  • They check out pages of people they already know or have met offline
  • They get information on classmates and people in their dorm/fraternity
  • ** All of these communications have is a strong tie to an offline network based on geography
  • They do not use it for finding dates, random hook-ups, or for making new friends.

Changes since Facebook started?

  • There is a heightened awareness of how public it is (because the interfaces is changing and related news coverage) and therefore there is more concern about privacy settings.

Big open question:

  • What does “friend” on these sites mean?

My thoughts:

I think that “friend” on a SN site is just a label for someone you know at any level. Scott Golder’s paper Rhythms of Social Interaction: messaging within a massive online network looks at how many of your “friends” you communicate with within Facebook and finds that it isn’t many of them!

I am intrigued that people do not use FB to meet new people. They are using it in ways that I can imagine using it myself.



Instantly Feel Older

My colleague Werner just sent me this article: IMing divides Teens, Adults. It reports on the different IM usage patterns between teenagers and those in their 50’s. (I don’t know why there’s such a large age gap between their study participants. I think you’d find similar differences between 20-somethings and 30-somethings.)

You probably know this already anecdotally, but it is interesting to see it broken out with numbers. For example, most adults who IM send less than 25 a day, whereas most teenagers send more than 25. Twenty percent of IM’ing teenagers send over 100 IM’s a day. Basically, adults use email; teenagers use IM.

While we can’t quite say that email is exclusively a technology for the older generation, I think it is becoming increasingly important to consider how to support these different generations that use different communication modes. What happens when we are all part of the same workforce? What will be the most effective way for a company to communicate?



BlackBerry Pearl 8100: PocketMac, Lotus Notes, and don’t drop it!

Ok, here is a quick, but hopefully information-full, post on the Pearl. I’ll cover syncing with the Mac (iCal & Address Book) and syncing with the PC (Lotus Notes 7 Calendar, Address book and To Do List).

But first, don’t drop your Pearl!

I dropped mine on Wednesday morning while riding every Bostonian’s least favorite subway line, the Green Line. Of course, the reason I took out my phone was that there was a broken down train up ahead and we were going to be stopped for a while. But I digress…

The phone had a “clean” fall — it didn’t tumble and landed flat on its back. And this broke the phone. Cosmetically the phone was still perfect, but the screen wouldn’t light up and the keys wouldn’t work. So I had to get a new phone! T-Mobile charges you for shipping the new phone to you ($15 for 2nd-Day UPS) and, if the damage is your fault, they charge you $100 for a replacement phone. The two times I called T-Mobile customer support and said “my phone is broken” to the voice prompt, I got a very fast response. I have no complaints about their customer support and the fees are high, but not unfair, I guess.

I got my new phone yesterday and spent this morning’s ride on the Green Line setting up the phone the way I had the old one. The software on the phone has been upgraded and the biggest change I can detect is that the contrast between the background screen and the application icons seems to be greater, which is good. A few of the set-up wizard options are different. The phone figured out over the network that I already had a Blackberry configured for email and it asked if I wanted to switch to checking those same email accounts on this new device. That couldn’t have been easier!

Ok, so syncing:

In my first few weeks of owning the Pearl, I was using a Mac, so I used PocketMac to sync with the Pearl. PocketMac is an independent software tool for syncing with the Blackberry and works pretty differently than the standard Blackberry Desktop Software for the PC. Here’s what I thought of it:

The positives:

  • Very easy to set up.
  • No errors or confusing log messages.
  • In general, this is my experience with most Mac applications (if you disagree, try switching to a PC!!). The software knows how to find iCal and Addressbook and you don’t have to do any special configuration.

The negatives:

  • PocketMac offers very few synchronization options. Your only option is to copy everything on the computer to the phone and vice versa. For example, with the calendar, there is no ability to control which events get synced, so I had to transfer several years of old calendar data to the phone.
  • Conflict resolution was not very clever. On my initial sync, I had duplicate entries for almost every address book entry because I only had phone numbers on my SIM card, not addresses. PocketMac treated each entry as a different person. What I would have liked to have had happen is the phone number from the phone override the phone number in the computer and have the 2 names merge into 1 person. Or at the very least, been prompted on how I would like to merge each duplicate entry. Instead I had to go in by hand and copy each of these phone numbers individually and then delete the duplicate entry and then re-sync.
  • Recurring calendar events are not handled well at all. In fact, I would say this is a bug in the software. When you have a recurring iCal event and you have deleted one instance of the event (say your weekly meeting doesn’t happen the week of Thanksgiving), PocketMac does not register this canceled event and keeps it in your calendar. So on the phone, I began to have all kinds of appointment conflicts between cancelled meetings and replacement meetings. (The error did not migrate into iCal, thankfully.) This is a real pain, especially considering the first issue I had, where you can’t specify which categories or dates of events to sync.

So in short, PocketMac does the job syncing your Pearl with your Mac, but it is pretty rudimentary.

Is syncing with a PC better?

I’m now living in Lotus Notes world, so I can only offer an opinion on how the Blackberry Desktop Software syncs with Lotus Notes 7 (the calendar, the addressbook and the to do list). I would say, the software behaves like a lot of PC applications I know: the software was confusing to set up, has about a million little ways to set options, and produced an indecipherable error which took some internet surfing to solve, but in the end the software offers a more full-featured syncing solution than on the Mac. I’m pretty excited about being able to sync my To Do list, since I’ve never been able to use my phone’s To Do list at all. When there are duplicates or any unusual syncing events, you get plenty of dialogue boxes providing you lots of choices. In exchange for the graceful simplicity of the Mac, you get to control everything on the PC.

In terms of the indecipherable error…. I couldn’t get the calendar to sync at all when I first tried. The desktop software reported there was an error and I should look in the error log. The error log said “Internal Error #4238.” Uh….. not so helpful. After some trial and error and a lot of internet surfing, I figured out it was because Lotus Notes was trying to get my calendar off a Notes database on my company’s intranet, which I was not connected to at the time.

The solution: Make sure that your Notes is looking at your local copy of your calendar/email/etc. I did this by specifying my location as “Island” in the lower right corner of the Notes 7 window. How not intuitive is that? Even if Notes isn’t running, you have to do this. So that is annoying, but it works.

Another Notes specific thing is you have to quit and restart Notes for any of the BlackBerry calendar events to appear in the calendar.

And finally, some general comments on the Pearl’s applications….

Josh asked me in a comment on my previous Pearl post about the browsing. It is OK, but in a head-to-head competition with the Treo’s browser, the Pearl takes about 10 times longer to load a page. Maybe that has something to do with different settings between the devices, but I’d say in general it is SLOW. (But when you are sitting on the Green Line with nothing else to do, slow is better than nothing. :) I briefly set the browser to render HTML tables — don’t do that. It makes loading much slower.

The IM interface isn’t very IM-like. It took me about an hour to realize someone had IM’d me on the phone and I forgot to log out because it wasn’t obvious that I was logged in. I’m not so interested in IM’ing on the go, so that isn’t a big deal for me.

The camera takes good pictures for a phone. There is some sort of flash that maybe, sort of works.

The calendar is a pretty nice interface, with a couple different ways of browsing (week, day, month, and a compressed list of events). The one thing that bugs me is that you can’t see the category of each calendar entry. (You also can’t see this easily in Lotus Notes, which is even more annoying, so now I have no way to see personal vs. work related events. I guess I’ll just stop categorizing anything.)

You can pick a couple different “Themes” for your top level device screen. I really like the “BB Dimension Today” theme because it shows you your last 2 email messages, your next 2 calendar events, and up to 2 missed calls.

In the 48 hours I lived without my Pearl I missed it, so I guess that means I recommend it. Just don’t drop it!



Why the Re-start? Because I now work at IBM Research

IBM CambridgeA couple of people have asked me why I retired my blog Sunfleet and moved my blog to www.joandimicco.com. Well, it is because I have switched companies. I now work at IBM Research in the Collaborative User Experience group located in Cambridge, MA. I’m working with David Millen on social software.

So this blog will continue to contain my thoughts on collaboration and social software along with details of my current projects. So stay tuned! I hope to be a more frequent contributor to the blogosphere.



 

The postings on this site are my own
and don’t represent my employer's positions, strategies or opinions.