The Register has a humorous article about how random and vague definitions of Web 2.0 are. They've decided to leave it up to the readers to figure it all out.

“We thought since no one can tell us what [Web 2.0] is, except for projecting fantasies of what they think it should be, something must be done, before investors lose their shirts. So we're throwing it open to the “collective intelligence” of El Reg, as no one does funnies next generation global computing architectures quite like you on a Friday.”

What do you think? Web 2.0 is made of …

  • Badger's paws
  • A magic swirling ship
  • Javascript worms
  • Recycled copies of Esther Dyson's Release 1.0 newsletter
  • Never mind, just give us the money

Article (with Poll) on the Register

More Web 2.0 hilarity: